Can you accept your body’s set point?

Every since Suzanne Somers titillated us with her thigh master contraption  years ago, and Jane Fonda started doing pelvic thrusts to sexy music we have been fascinated with being skinny. Ok, it’s actually been a lot longer than that but I was going for some visuals here.

Most people I know who diet say they want to be skinny. And not much else motivates them to try the different diets out there that promise to get the weight off in record short time. A little secret; If it took you years to put the weight on, it ain’t coming off in 30 days, not without major surgical intervention and major side-effects (like malnutrition and death).

Low fat, low-calorie, low taste, low nutritional diets are successful at being low success – hence the reason there are so many. People get addicted to the hype and promise of beauty and success that the models used to portray “real” results show you. So you try again and again only to fail again and again – but hey, there’s another diet just around the corner and maybe that one will work if you can just figure out the key to unlocking its success.

Here’s the skinny on skinny:

source: ebaumsworld.com

The last time I saw skinny people like this they were POWs.  This example of skinny is probably not what most of us have in mind when we try to lose weight, but that’s what skinny looks like. To get to look like that takes a lot of time and effort to override your body’s survival instinct to eat. And that is why no one can sustain a diet that is low in nutrition. If you have failed at countless diets, congratulations! You are a successful failure at letting your body eat itself for survival and you get to live a little longer.

So, your set point, let’s get to that. Your set point is a natural range that your body naturally goes to when you don’t starve it or abuse it with countless diets that don’t work. And even overweight people can be starving for nutrients when they eat dead foods (which I am not implying cannot be cooked and must be raw to be living foods), on the contrary. Dead foods do not provide your body with any nutrition and only fills you up emotionally but temporarily as emotions cannot be dealt with by eating. We know that, but we do it anyway, just like diets, we do them even though we know they don’t really work.

If you were to resume eating nutritious foods that fed your mind, your cells and your body and your body settled on a certain number that in your mind didn’t fit with what you think you should weigh, but you were the healthiest you had ever been and you felt great and loved life again, would you accept your set point?  Even if it meant going up a few pounds (if you have been skinny but miserable)?

Everyone has a different set point based on their genetics and genetics can be very hard to change. Tall people are tall and short people are short. Two people can be the same weight but one looks thinner and one looks more curvy. But both are at their optimal set points and both are healthy, happy and feel alive.

Do not be so concerned with a number when you start to eat right, your body may in fact decide that this is too good to be true and hold on to some weight  initially, but  then release the weight once it accepts that the crazy dieting has stopped and it can relax and let go and enjoy the moment. And you will too.

Are there sacrifices to eating better? Sure. Just as there are sacrifices when you don’t eat well. Life is about sacrifices and benefits. Benefits become evident quickly when you start to nourish your body and what you initially saw as a sacrifice doesn’t seem so anymore. It becomes a trade-off, a willing omission of certain behaviours that never did anything good for you in the first place, but now you can see that clearly and the burden of sacrifices eases and dissipates and you’re left wondering what you ever saw in that kind of eating before.

Your set point isn’t a goal to achieve, it’s a place that you get to naturally and you realize you’re there after you’ve been there for a while. It’s that comfortable place in your body that you have always tried to get to by dieting but could never find the key to open the door until you’re there.

 

 

The Importance of Saturated Fats for Biological Functions (repost)

Written by Mary G. Enig, PhD

July 8 2004

Many people recognize that saturated fats are needed for energy, hormone production, cellular membranes and for organ padding. You may be surprised to learn that certain saturated fatty acids are also needed for important signaling and stabilization processes in the body.

Signaling processes work in the cells at the level of the membrane proteins, many of which are called G-protein receptors. The G-protein receptors become stimulated by different molecules and can be turned off or on in a manner similar to a binary light switch, which remains on for a limited time and then flips itself off until it is stimulated again.

The saturated fatty acids that play important roles in these processes are the 16-carbon palmitic acid, the 14-carbon myristic acid and the 12-carbon lauric acid. These saturated fatty acids are found in certain food fats. Palmitic acid, for example, comprises 45 percent of palm oil and about 25 percent of animal and dairy fats. Furthermore, the body makes palmitic acid out of excess carbohydrates and excess protein.

A biochemical process called palmitoylation, in which the body uses palmitic acid in stabilization processes, although not very well known, is very important to our health.

When these important saturated fatty acids are not readily available, certain growth factors in the cells and organs will not be properly aligned. This is because the various receptors, such as G-protein receptors, need to be coupled with lipids in order to provide localization of function.

The messages that are sent from the outside of the cell to the inner part of the cell control many functions including those activated by, for example, adrenaline in the primitive mammalian fight/flight reactions. When the adrenal gland produces adrenaline and the adrenaline (beta-adrenergic) receptor communicates with the G-protein and its signal cascade, the parts of the body are alerted to the need for action; the heart beats faster, the blood flow to the gut decreases while the blood flow to the muscles increases and the production of glucose is stimulated.

The G-proteins come in different forms; the alpha subunit is covalently linked to myristic acid and the function of this subunit is important for turning on and off the binding to an enzyme called adenylate cyclase and thus the amplification of important hormone signals.

When researchers looked at the fatty acid composition of the phospholipids in the T-cells (white blood cells), from both young and old donors, they found that a loss of saturated fatty acids in the lymphocytes was responsible for age-related declines in white blood cell function. They found that they could correct cellular deficiencies in palmitic acid and myristic acid by adding these saturated fatty acids.

Most Westerners consume very little myristic acid because it is provided by coconut oil and dairy fats, both of which we are told to avoid. But myristic acid is a very important fatty acid, which the body uses to stabilize many different proteins, including proteins used in the immune system and to fight tumors. This function is called myristoylation; it occurs when myristic acid is attached to the protein in a specific position where it functions usefully. For example, the body has the ability to suppress production of tumors from lung cancer cells if a certain genetically determined suppressor gene is available. This gene is called fus1 and is a protein that has been modified with covalent addition of the saturated fatty acid myristic acid. Thus, the loss of myristic acid from the diet can have unfortunate consequences, including cancer and immune system dysfunction.

Lauric acid has several functions. It is an antimicrobial fatty acid on its own and as a monoglyceride. It also has the function of stabilization when it is attached to certain proteins in a similar fashion to myristic acid and palmitic acid.

Stearic acid is the 18-carbon saturated fatty acid. The main sources are animal tallows, which contain about 20-25 percent stearic acid, and chocolate, which contains about 35 percent stearic acid. In other foods it occurs only on levels of 1-2 percent.

How much total saturated do we need? During the 1970s, researchers from Canada found that animals fed rapeseed oil and canola oil developed heart lesions. This problem was corrected when they added saturated fat to the animals diets. On the basis of this and other research, they ultimately determined that the diet should contain at least 25 percent of fat as saturated fat. Among the food fats that they tested, the one found to have the best proportion of saturated fat was lard, the very fat we are told to avoid under all circumstances!

These are some of the complex but vital reasons we need to include palm oil, coconut oil, butter and lard in our diets.

This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Spring 2004.

About the Author

Mary G. Enig, PhDMary G. Enig, PhD is an expert of international renown in the field of lipid biochemistry. She has headed a number of studies on the content and effects of trans fatty acids in America and Israel, and has successfully challenged government assertions that dietary animal fat causes cancer and heart disease. Recent scientific and media attention on the possible adverse health effects of trans fatty acids has brought increased attention to her work. She is a licensed nutritionist, certified by the Certification Board for Nutrition Specialists, a qualified expert witness, nutrition consultant to individuals, industry and state and federal governments, contributing editor to a number of scientific publications, Fellow of the American College of Nutrition and President of the Maryland Nutritionists Association. She is the author of over 60 technical papers and presentations, as well as a popular lecturer. Dr. Enig is currently working on the exploratory development of an adjunct therapy for AIDS using complete medium chain saturated fatty acids from whole foods. She is Vice-President of the Weston A Price Foundation and Scientific Editor of Wise Traditions as well as the author of Know Your Fats: The Complete Primer for Understanding the Nutrition of Fats, Oils, and Cholesterol, Bethesda Press, May 2000. She is the mother of three healthy children brought up on whole foods including butter, cream, eggs and meat.

———————-

source: http://www.westonaprice.org/know-your-fats/importance-of-saturated-fats-for-biological-functions – reposted from @AnnChildersMD

What have I noticed since I started?

Aside from blogging, I also keep a written diary (sort of) of my experiences in weight loss and dieting. I keep this by my bed and I write something down nearly every night.  These entries are usually last minute thoughts or notes for a future blog entry.

This little notebook dates back a few years as I have jotted down ideas, thoughts and what-not of all kinds of things I have done to try and get control of my weight. When I have previously posted about the many ways I have tried to lose weight, I didn’t include these methods.

So, let’s share some ways we have tried to lose weight shall we?

The first entry is dated September  3rd 2010. I began the HED diet. The high everything diet. In theory you raise your body temperature to jump start fat burning and increase metabolism. And to make sure this worked, I started using visualization with Jon Gabriel. How this works: upon waking you take your temperature and chart it everyday, and you eat a lot of everything. This calms the body’s reaction to dieting and you start to burn body fat. I charted my temperature for 30 days, took bodily measurements weekly. I gained in the bust, lost in the waist, lost in the hips and gained in the thighs (about one inch up and one inch down in corresponding places).

Fast forward a year (to the day), I started following the Vega plan. This is a vegan raw food replacement, shakes and meal replacement bars. I even met the creator of the Vega raw food line, Brendan Brazier.  How this works: you have two shakes a day, and a light meal once a day. I lasted until November 28/11. Didn’t lose anything, except my self respect…

Then in January of this year I bought a vibrating platform. I did 10 minutes a day (all the literature warns about going over the 10 minutes a day) for three months. Nothing happened. (I cannot do typical exercise as I dislocated my hip two summers ago and I have some issues with applying pressure to that hip). So “dieting” for me is pretty much how I will lose weight until the excess weight is off and I can start being more active and not further injure my hip.

Fast forward to Mar 3rd 2012 and this entry;

“Doing *10 minutes M-F, have not noticed any further changes. No weight loss, no flexibility other than earlier reported. No improved movement. No improved energy. Quite disappointed to say the least. Have researched doing an egg diet (I hate the word diet – but there is no other term for it), eating eggs for all three meals (instead of meat), have begun to incorporate more eggs as I eat up existing foods. The egg council of Canada has a site with dozens of recipes for egg dishes. So far so good. This is like the Atkins diet, but with eggs. I will eat seafood but not much other animal meat, cheese and some veggies (spinach, mushrooms, onions, green peppers, olives (including tapenade), broccoli, asparagus, cauliflower and brussel sprouts), and honey for tea and coffee, butter, coconut oil and cream…”

From March 3rd to March 10th I continued to eat more eggs and decrease foods I had that were flour based, starchy and refined. As I ate up the less desirable foods, I added in more of the healthier foods I wanted to eat, eggs, cheese, veggies and such.

I then created the blog eggkinsdiet on wordpress and launched my ideas to the world on March 10th.

And quite naturally, on March 18th, I packed up what remained of the starchy and refined foods and went full on with eggkins.

So, what have I learned? That when I plan to go on a “diet”, despite my best effort and intentions the diet fails. For example, before doing a diet where I know I will have to deny myself certain foods, I go out the day before and gorge on that food because I will never ever have it again. All I can think about is that food and I crave it and I want it and I eventually cave.

But this time, I hadn’t set an actual date. The day that I switched to eating better happened spontaneously and without any effort. There was no last minute pig out. There was simply a feeling that told me today is the day and I changed. This reminds me of the many times (probably 20-30 times) that I tried to quit smoking, until the last day I smoked, September 27th 1991. I had set a future date on the calendar and every day I looked at the calendar, I saw that date circled and I looked forward to it. On that date, I had my last cigarette, had my laser therapy and never looked back.

So what is different this time around, what feels different this time as opposed to every other time I have “dieted” is that it isn’t a diet. Yes, there are some foods that I am not currently eating, not because I am denying myself, but because I do not want them right now.  Will I ever have them again? I don’t know, the same way that I don’t know 100% if I will ever smoke again. I do know that right now, I don’t want to smoke or eat food that will only derail me. And as with every day that I didn’t smoke has added up to nearly 21 years smoke free, everyday that I don’t derail myself will eventually add up to more reasons to continue than against any reason to revert back.

And the biggest side effect that I have noticed so far? How stable my mood has been, virtually no cravings and positive mental energy.

My goal is to become chronically healthy.

so eat ! and stop dieting!

* refers to the use of the vibrating platform

What’s for dinner tonight?

I whipped up two eggs with a couple tbsp of cream.

Cooked my omelet in coconut oil, added some steamed asparagus spears and added 1/4 cup shredded monterey jack cheese.

Folded that baby over and voila!

The eggkinsdiet ain’t no diet

It’s interesting that as soon as I created my Facebook page (shameless plug), the ads that began appearing were for “diets’.  I click the “x” and choose against my views because the eggkinsdiet isn’t a diet.

It is a weight management “life” style, but eggkinsweightmanagementlifestyle would have been to long and hard to remember, so I chose diet.

http://www.dictionary.com gives these descriptors for diet;

1.  food and drink considered in terms of its qualities, composition, and its effects on health
2.  a particular selection of food, especially as designed or prescribed to improve a person’s physical condition or to prevent or treat a disease
3.  such a selection or a limitation on the amount a person eats for reducing weight
4.  the foods eaten, as by a particular person or group
5.  food or feed habitually eaten or provided

I would say that four out of five descriptors are exactly what eggkins is about, with the exception of number 3, I offer a modified point. By selecting and eating foods (in abundance) that will nourish my body, in a way that will allow me to limit (and eliminate) foods that currently do not provide my body with any real value, and thus resulting in overall weight reduction.

That weight loss will be the end result of following this eating plan and not the sole reason makes this a non diet as far as the diet industry interprets it.  How much weight loss experienced, that will be up to my body to decide (we all have a set weight point).

I want to reclaim the word diet and use it in the way that it was intended to be used, and not the deprivation inducing four letter word it has become.

If “diets” (the calorie reducing kind) really worked, there wouldn’t be hundreds of them.  And our waistlines wouldn’t be getting bigger. Healthy bodies aren’t a result of reducing the overall amount of food we consume, but the overall amount of the kinds of food we consume while increasing other kinds.

 

 

A calories is not just a calorie (re-post)

I couldn’t have said it better myself

———————————————————————————————————————–

A calorie is not a calorie when it comes to how likely it is to be stored as body fat. We can think about human biology like this: When we eat, a traffic cop tells calories where to go. How Aggressively calories approach this traffic cop determines their chances of being stored as body fat.

The traffic cop directs calories to repair, fuel, or fatten us—in that order. It first makes sure we have enough fuel to rebuild anything that has broken down. Next, it keeps us doing whatever we are doing. Last, it seeks to protect us from starving. As long as we have a calm and consistent flow of calories coming into our system, the cop does a great job directing them.

However, when calories approach the traffic cop Aggressively, it gets angry, throws its clipboard down, and sends those calories to fat cells. Our body is fine with a lot of food. It is Aggressive food that aggravates it. Five hundred calm calories creeping into the bloodstream over many hours are less likely to be stored as body fat than five hundred Aggressive calories rushing in all at once. Like the rest of us, our body does not do its best work when dealing with a bunch of Aggressive requests all at once.

To best understand calories’ Aggression we first need to understand how our body fuels itself. It does not run on the food we eat. It runs primarily on glucose, a sugar our body creates from the food we eat. That may seem like a meaningless distinction, but it is not.

Storing body fat is not caused by eating a lot of food. Storing body fat is about a response to eating food that causes us to have more glucose in our bloodstream than we can use at one time. That is why calories’ Aggression matters so much. The more Aggressive calories are, the faster they increase the levels of glucose in our bloodstream. The faster calories increase our glucose levels, the more likely we are to have more glucose than the body can deal with at one time. That’s when it shuttles the excess into our fat cells.

The distinction between “a lot of food” and “a lot of glucose right now” is important. We can eat all the food we want and never gain body fat if the glucose the food generates does not exceed the glucose level we can deal with right then. Fortunately, SANE foods prevent excess glucose from getting into our bloodstream. If we simply focus on increasing the amount of water-, fiber-, and protein-packed high-Satiety foods we are eating, we will automatically avoid Aggressive calories and store less body fat.

Jonathan Bailor
http://www.facebook.com/TheSmarterScienceOfSlim
http://twitter.com/#!/jonathanbailor

Are we fat because we eat too much, or do we eat too much because we are fat?

That’s an interesting question isn’t it?

I have heard Gary Taubes and others who subscribe to the beleif that fat doesn’t make us fat say that the accumulation of fat is a metabolic disorder of accumulating fat. Say that fast 10 times.

I have spent a lot of time trying to figure out why I am not motivated to exercise in order to lose weight. My doctor (who is well close to 60 lbs overweight himself) tells me that all I need to do to lose weight is eat less and exercise more.  To which I have replied “you can’t run a car on empty, where am I supposed to get the energy to exercise. I can barely make it out of the house on good days”.  His reply is always, you’ll get energy when you start spending energy.

What? Does the car magically fill up with gas as you drive it?

Something is wrong with that beleif.   And as I watch the videos of these new pioneers who are turning beliefs of health and fat loss on their ears I am hopeful, if only slightly (for now).

Let me say that I am at most, 40 lbs overweight but have the (lack of) energy of a much more overweight person. I do not see myself as lazy, or unmotivated. I just don’t have energy to spend. I am in a constant break even (just barely) state and when I have tried to push myself, my health goes down quickly. It is like paying for a million dollar mortgage with a chauffeur’s salary. No matter how much I want to live in that mansion, I cannot pull the way of doing it out of thin air.

I can say that when I have lost weight (I lost 40 lbs on WW many years ago) I was spry and energetic and was quite active.

So back to the question, am I fat because I eat too much, or do I eat too much because I am fat?

If the accumulation of fat is a metabolic imbalance, why do we still, as a society blame the ill person for their disorder? Do we call the cancer patient names? Do we mock the lupus patient behind their back, mimicking them for a cheap chuckle?

Overweightedness (is that even a word) is a symptom of a person’s body to properly metabolize the food they put into their bodies. An overweight person’s body is the perfect storm really.

Being overweight is no more nor less an indicator of a person’s character or worth or degree of respect as a human being.

Packed up my starches and going full on with eggkins

I guess today is the day!

I packed up what starches I had left (that I was keeping just in case – of what exactly?) and out of the house they are going.

As I had posted in another entry, I was weaning out one way of eating and incorporating another, the eggkins way. A low carb, moderate protein and now I have decided (after visiting Peter Attia’s site War On Insulin ) a higher saturated fat eating lifestyle with eggs in place of all land animal protein and some fish protein.

If you look at this page you’ll see what foods can be eaten on a high fat, moderate protein low carb eating lifestyle.

Fat does a body good.

 

 

Good Calories – Bad Calories (Gary Taubes) Not a book review

A little over a year and a half ago, I was searching (yet again) for a “diet” book. I wanted to make a change in my life as I was quite unhappy with myself. I perused the aisles and was unimpressed mostly with what I saw.

Books by famous reality TV trainers (bully).

Books by actresses looking all touched up (plastic surgery).

And on and on it went. Then a book cover caught my eye. It was a slice of toast with a pat of butter on it, Good Calories, Bad Calories. I remember thinking “ok, a book on portion control that will allow me to eat butter”, so without much more thought I bought the book.

I got home, made myself a coffee and headed out to the backyard and cracked my new diet book open.

Boy was I fooled by the cover! “Don’t judge a book by its cover” jolted me out of my misconceptions about food and eating.

I devoured the book like it was greasy chips with dip, but it was a long read as it was quite dry and “scientific” for the most part.

I was amazed that so much research had been ignored and/or skewed to fit someones agenda. There are studies upon studies that disproves our current way of thinking about calories, fat and eating healthy. That eating saturated fats is actually good for us. Foods like butter, coconut oil, olive oil, cheeses and the list goes on and on. I started eating more like book presents. Friends started asking me what I was doing different. I told them I was eating more healthy fats. My friends wanted to get involved, they bought the book but they soon found it too much of technical book to read and it went dusty on their shelves.

Meanwhile, my life had other plans for me and I went through a very upsetting (spiraling) time in my life and eating healthy dropped to the wayside (stress, funds, insanity!) and  here I am again.

All this to say that Gary Taubes has compressed GC, BC  into an easier to read (and understand) book called Why We Get Fat.

I came across these videos of Gary giving a talk about why we get fat to medical professionals (JumpSmartMD).

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3